Pet en l'air, 2010
Pet en l'air is cute, practical and economical as it doesn't take very much material. On outdoor events it can be worn with an easily washable skirt. It's also good training for making a full length sack dress. All very good reasons to choose it for my next 18th century dress after the anglaise/polonaise.
I already had a blue skirt, so I wanted something to go with it, and being one of my favorite colors pink was a strong candidate. I happened to make a short trip to Tallinn on my summer holiday, and as a friend gave me a good list of fabric stores I went through them with this project on my mind among others. I even happened to find an amazingly beautiful pink silk satin, but naturally it was costly too. I might have been able to put that sum into a pet-en-l'air-sized piece, but whether I would ever have the courage to cut it is another matter. The mental strain of cutting Jarno's 18th century coat fresh in my mind at the moment I decided to continue to search for something more affordable and thus less frightening to work with. Dupioni might do, being cheaper but still not very cheap, but as it's not the authentic choise either I began to consider some blatantly plastic alternative.
shop of my tour offered a pleasant sight for my fatigued
eyes: A delightfully pink taffeta which looked just like
something out of Coppola's Marie Antoinette and just
screamed "candy". My inner period voice of course hissed
that it was a tad too pink and, oh the horror, acetate.
But then again, it was irresistibly cute (not to mention
cheap), and inspired visions of almost comically pretty
pink outfit, partly as a tribute to that
not-always-period-correct but enchantingly beautiful
So, I had the material which I was very excited about, but I still had Jarno's coat to make, followed by other stuff and then just laziness almost to the point of hibernation. Every now and then I sneaked to the closet to admire the taffeta, as the color alone cheered me up. At last, on February or so, I began working on it. The first thing was to finish at last the pocket hoops I would need with it. Their story can be found on the 18th century underwear page.
pattern source was Janet Arnold's "Patterns of Fashion I",
which feautures a pet en l'air dated c 1745-1755. This pet
en l'air has slightly shallower back pleats than usually
seen in sack dresses though they looks identical from the
outside. My guess would be that a short dress doesn't need
as much fullness to fall gracefully. For my pet I copied
the the length, the back pleats and side pleats, adding
only one extra pleat on the side seam on the front hem
piece to get more room for my pocket hoops. The shape of
the sleeve flounce is also copied from the book.
The mock up
for the lining was followed by the test run for the whole
thing. I was happy to find that everything seemed to work
rather well, the sleeve head remained a bit obscure but I
happily decided to determine the exact shape later. The
front pleats created an awkward curve on the edge of the
stays, but after pondering about it I came into the
conclusion that it must be to some extent inevitable
unless you cut them separately from the front egdes and
shape them to curve. What puzzles me, though, is that you
seldom see this phenomenom in portraits. Anyway, I deciced
to live with them and pin them down.
My other dilemma at this point was what to do with the lower ends of the front pleats. Once again I noticed that even though you imagine having done your research and know what you are doing, odd questions have a habit of emerging as you go. Often the ends of the pleats seem to be sewn down on the front edges of the skirt and covered with trimming, but sometimes you see them just bluntly ending - like in this reproduction. Just like in my pet en l'air, the skirt opens so wide at the front that the pleat ends wouldn't even lie smoothly if sewed down to the edges. Thus I decided to follow this example. It means, though, that when I some day begin my first sack dress I still have some problems to solve.
|Having fairly reliable
patterns in my hands now I took out the taffeta and began to
iron the folds. Like often happens, I lacked the patience to
wait until the steam iron was fully heated and instead of
steam it splashed a few drops of water on the taffeta. I
ironed on until I suddenly noticed that the water stains had
not dissappeared, but had left clearly visible marks. I
tried to wash and steam the stains away, but they just got
bigger. I haven't worked with acetate often so this was a
very nasty surprise. One of my reasons for picking an
artificial fibre material, apart from the budget issues, had
been that it would be easy to wash, but if pure water
stained it so badly how could I even wear the damn thing?
Some muttered curses followed, and for a moment I considered searching for another material, but then again I was quite excited about the project, still liked the way the taffeta looked and thus finally decided to continue. At least I would learn from this project. So I cut the pet, trying to avoid stained spots, only to notice when I was finished that there had been a large stain on the other side on the front skirt. I put the whole piece in a bucket and lifted it to dry, careful not to crease it. The stains magically dissapeared, but washing the finished garment without ending up with any creases might be another matter. But as I had already cut the thing I might as well continue working on it, though I was beginning to have grave doubts.
|I had even originally
planned to use some shortcuts in the construction,
considering this as a kind of test run for a real sack
dress, and my problems with the material made it seem even a
better idea. According to this plan I also skipped buying a
new white lining material, and used the grey one I happened
to have home - it wouldn't even really show, I thought. It
was, by they way, the same cotton-polyester blend I had used
for my polonaise.
A sack dress has a hidden lacing under the back pleats, which makes pinning it on at the front much easier and also allows for some adjusting in the size. The lacing holes should, of course, be hand bound, but as I was going to make this fast I stitched on a looped braid and bias tape boning channels with machine.
Before making the back pleats I hemmed the pocket slits, moving back to handsewing of course as I was working with something visible on the outside. As the taffeta was 300cm wide I had used the whole width, not bothering to piece and seam it just because due to the period material widths the originals had more vertical seams. The hemline (which is cut about 10cm longer at the back) had already looked nice on the mock uo version, so I dediced it would't need any later checking and have the rare opportunity to finish it at this early point of the construction. I used tiny running stitch, easy and fast and often seen in the period.
|Somewhere at the early stages of the project I also hemmed the sleeve flounces. I'm rather skeptical about the durability of the period correct pinked edges, especially at sleeves which brush against the skirts all the time, so I chose to narrowly hem them instead - also keeping in mind that I might have to be washing this one all the time. Besides, small parts like this aren't too painful to hem because you can easily carry them around with you and work on them a few moments now and then.|
return to the main piece... after finishing the hem and
the pocket slits it was time to pin the back pleats. I
had already had good practise with the mock up and
marked the pleats on the pattern, so it shouldn't have
been very hard - only it happened, that I realised
another problem with the taffeta I had not anticipated,
namely that it was so thin that the contrast between
white tape on the boning channels and the grey lining
could be seen through quite clearly. Well, they are
covered by the pleats, but how about the white lining in
the sleeves with the grey lining in the bodice? Or the
dark blue petticoat for that matter?
At this point I seriously considered for a second time giving up with this material. But again I decided that as I had cut it anyway, and also made some progress already I could as well go on. I bought white lining material, made a new lining, and also now had time to consider the lacing anew, which resulted in making the top of the lacing rounded and edged with bias tape, hoping that this would make it take the strain of the tight fitting better. The transparency issues at the bodice were thus solved, about the skirts I decided to worry about later. The Pet en l'air in Arnold's "Patterns" is wholly lined (minus the back pleats), by the way, but I was reluctant both to pick up the hem I had already finished and experience the headache of trying to get a lining material go smoothly with the slippery taffeta.
I already mentioned that I expected the back pleats to be easy, well, it wasn't exactly terribly difficult but, with a slippery material, took some time. I wasn't quite sure whether I was supposed to stitch the top pleats only through all the layers of the taffeta or also through the lining. I chose the latter because I reasoned it might help to take away the strain off the taffeta and thus avoid it raveling around the sticthes.
Next I made the front waist seam and began to mount the taffeta on the front bodice lining, following the tutorial on La Couturiere Parisienne. The straight part of the front edge seam is machine sewn, the curved upper part I sewed by hand. When the front edge seam was finished I pinned and basted the taffeta on the lining on the side seam and armhole, which left a fold of extra material on the top part as you can see in the picture. I pinned that into a dart close to the edge, and sewed it by hand - when sewing a lot by hand anyway this is actually quite easy compared to drawing this big shaped dart in the pattern like you would do in a modern garment.
In the picture the fold on the front pleat is already ironed, next thing was to turn the edge and sew it on the the edge. In theory you could, of course, sew the pleat and the front edge on the lining edge with a machine on a single seam, turning the edges inside the bodice (a technique I used in my mock up version), but on the other hand this period method gives you some room for adjusting stuff if all the pieces are not super precicely cut or the material is tricky. And as the seams are short, it doesn't really take that much time. Of course, time consumption is not really that important when you are sewing just for the fun of it (especially with a good audio book) and not for profit...
After finishing the front edges it was the time for side seams. Once again I had to choose from familiar common sense methods and those I had seen, read of, and partially understood, and in the end I chose to make both the taffeta and lining side seams separately. For this I had to pick up the armhole basting and redo it after finishing the side seams. Now I could also sew the vertical handstitched line on the back, which fastens the loose taffeta on the lining so that the back remains fitted under the pleats. This little stitching helps a lot to give a sack dress it's elegant form, the unique combination of loose and fitting.
At this point I tried the Pet en l'air on. I pinned the side pleats on one side and closed the shoulder seams - as my mock up had fitted to well I skipped the precaution to pin them first. Fortunately the shoulder line was still fine, and the whole thing was so very pretty that my slightly dampened enthusiams for it returned. To my pleasant surprise the skirts did not look as transparent over the darker petticoat as I had feared.
Next I arranged the side pleats slightly overlapping as you can see in the picture, and sewed their upper edge together. Then I finished the back neckline by sewing a strap of taffeta to cover the top of the pleats - the tight corners were a rather interesting piece of work. On the neckline I turned the strap over the edge on the inside - the top edge of the back should have been left raw and finished with this little extra piece, but I had, characteristically, been madly afraid of fraying once again and made that with seam allowance too, so now I turned all the layers on the inside, resulting in a quite thick top edge - the next time I'm going to go the period way in this. To continue with my anti-fraying neatening madness, I bound the shoulder seam allowances on the lining with cotton tape.
|The main part thus being
almost finished I attacked the sleeves. I bag lined the
taffeta with a thin batiste lining, hand stitching the
sleeve end. The way of attaching the ruffles is copied
from the Rockin'
the Rococo Pet en l'air - again chosen for the
durability and the lack of raw edges. Probably this is,
once again, common knowledge among costumers, but I like
to give credit to where I learned a thing if I happen to
remember it! I would be utterly lost without accomplished
people willing to share their experience... But to return
to the sleeves, the upper edge is turned under, then the
flounce is gathered 1,5cm from the top edge and sewn down
to the sleeve on a basted line 1,5cm from the edge of the
sleeve. This is why I love my mock ups: Knowing already
that the sleeve was the right shape and length I could put
on the flounces without having to twist and turn the whole
dress in my lap.
Once it's the time to set your sleeves in you always wish for either a clone or a higly skilled helper who can also read your mind. Sadly my dress dummy can't help me here as it's armholes are for some reason so bulky that you can't often even get finished clothes on it. Anyway, 18th century sleeve is first sewn on the bodice on the underarm, and then the top of the sleeve is pleated on the shoulder piece, over it actually, with the neckline pleats finally covering the raw edges and stitches. Actually it sounds like a very nice way of being able to adjust the sleeve without having a perfect pattern, but perhaps I'm just too fond of my patterns then because I found pleating the top sleeve awfully frustrating. Strangely, the mock up sleeve had seemed fine to me when I just pleated it hastily, now I spend eternity trying to make my pleats both attractive and identical on both sleeves, and getting the right fit to the sleeve. I was even once stitching them on when I decided that I wasn't happy with them after all and took them out again.
|At last I ended up changing
my pattern as far as the seam allowances I had cut
allowed, making it wider at the front. As they still
seemed too tight on the front side of my shoulder I
finally moved some of the pleats a bit forward and also
left the sleevehead as loose as the taffeta would allow
without getting too wrinkly on the front. Actually I think
that the main problem is my less than aristrocratic
posture, both my sewing and my work make my shoulders bend
forward too much for the period fit. Lacing myself tighter
might also help, though, but I'm not going to go into
tight-lacing training for this hobby (at least yet!)
Another thing that I did with the sleeve was to make the armhole smaller, thinking that it might help with my arms moving more freely in tight sleeves. Either in spite of that or because of it I seem to get a great wrinkle in the bodice under my arm - maybe some kind expert happens to come along and explain me why before I begin my dream sack dress.
The sleeves might also be just a bit too long, as they tend to ride upwards and make wrinkles in the arm - though perhaps this is somewhat inevitable. Too long chemise sleeves certainly don't help any, as I have to push them up all the time too. I'm going to fix them... some day.
Anyway, after despairing over the sleeves I decided to make as many many mock ups as it takes to get the perfectly fitting sleeve before cutting the real sleeves the next time.
piece to make was the stomacher. Like I mentioned, I had
originally sketched it on a piece of muslin, and on the
next fitting enlarged it a bit as the dress felt
tighter. When I was fairly happy with the shape of the
pattern I cut to pieces of the lining material, making
boning channels in them, and a top layer of taffeta. For
the boning I used plastic cable ties.
It took me some time to decide how to decorate the stomacher. At first I had planned the classic ruchings with pinked edges, but as I was now worried that I would have to be washing it all the time I became afraid they would fray too much. I had also by now decided to leave the front pleats untrimmed to get a more simple look on the pink dress instead of super-fluffiness with all the possible pinked trimmings. I also wanted to keep it all taffeta so the stomacher trimmings would also have to be fashioned from that.
At last I began, as a bit of surprise, consider a row of bows. A row of bows in the bocide always kind of reminds me of the pseudo-rococo fancydress-gowns with a very distant relation to the real thing, even though the bows were actually a common decorative detail on the period. But alas, as I made a few bows just to see how it would look I began to grow quite fond of the idea.
I cut a few long strips of taffeta and hemmed the edges. I ended up making the top rosette with six loops, followed by a couple on simple ones, and finally the last strips I simply gathered on the center. It's a combination of a few different trimming techniques I've seen, I'm not 100% sure if they can be combined, but it looks pretty to me and is not quite the basic row of bows.
For the last thing I sewed short pieces of cotton tape on the sides of the stomacher for pinning it on the stays. Then the front edges are in their turn pinned on the stomacher, the front pleats conveniently hiding the pins. Here the hidden lacing in the back is invaluable, when you have fastened the front you can tighten it to give the dress a snug fit.
As you can see in the picture, I solved the matter of the ill-fitting front pleats by pinning a little dart to smooth them down.
|After banging my head on
the wall a few times, as usually happens in the course of
any more challenging project, in the end I'm quite happy
with the result. Pet en l'air both a valuable learning
project thinking of my long time dream, a sack dress, and
also a very lovely addition to my 18th century wardrobe.
The very first event I wore it was a picnic on a rainy
day, and it got soaked pretty badly, but happily the
stains didn't show as badly as I had thought, so the
material choice was also less of disaster that I had
The pictures are taken this time on a June evening on the grounds of a house in Tampere called Näsinlinna. It's built in late 19th century so it's a bit anachronistic but beautiful nevertheless.
<< Back to the Project page