Stays, 2013/2014
My sister
Kaisa has attended her first 18th century balls wearing my
Chemise a'la Reine, and like most people soon became addlicted
with the re-enacting madness. We have often talked about making
a wardrobe of her own, and finally I got down to it. I naturally
began with the undergarments. The shift and petticoat are mostly
machine sewed basic stuff I won't bother you with, but a few
words about the stays will serve as an excuse for the fun of a
photoshoot.

I decided to make very basic stays
with hidden boning channels and a wide front lacing over a
separate stomacher like several pairs I have made. The
stays are half-boned with 8mm wide cable tie. Kaisa wanted her
period persona dated to 1780's due to both aesthetic reasons and
her academic fascination with late 18th century literature.
Front laced stays are not really correct for the period, but
they allow easy adjustment for the bust curve and a lot of
sizing allowance so they were a safe choice for a first pair of
stays. The advantage of being able to put them on yourself is
also handy in the modern world.

Drafting
the pattern
Kaisa is used to wearing victorian style corsets, so she could
easily tell when the amount of compression was right for her. I
took the measurements with her wearing an under-bust corset, so
I got the waist circumference I would aim for, and we estimated
the level of the raised bust and the front length for the stays,
how high the armhole should go etc.
Kaisa's measurements
were close to my friend Ida's, to whom I had recently made a pair of
stays, so I used her pattern as a base for Kaisa's. I
added 0,5cm to all pattern edges on the seams. As Kaisa has a
wider back than Ida I left the center back of Ida's stays for
lacing edge without reducing anything for a lacing gap. On the
front I lowered the very high front edge on Ida's stays a bit
and left ample allowances on the stomacher at this stage.
I made the first mock up, where Kaisa who was visiting for the
fitting helped by cutting the bones. There would, of course,
be plenty of tweaking. The back was too long at the waist and
pressed the back muscles uncomfortably so I had to open the
slits between tabs for several centimetres. The back seam also
needed more curve to give more room at the waist. On the other
hand the lacing gat was wider at the top, so I took 1cm off at
the lacing edge at the waist. I also took the side-back/side
piece seam a bit in at the waist, where the waist is more
flexible.
At the front
the side-front seam needed much more curve to create the more
curvaceous late 18th century silhouette. The generously sized
stomacher was also of course way too wide. The front edge,
however, was a bit too low, and the neckline sides had to
shaped a bit.

The shoulder straps were too wide apart at
the back and the underarm needed some re-shaping too. Due to all
the tweaking with the back seams and straps I ended up placing
the side-back seams to end in the middle of the shoulder strap
base. The side-back piece became curved and widening at the
bottom, and it actually looks something like in the stays
pattern in Kyoto Costume Institute's Fashion- book (part one,
page 126).
I also got inspired to draft some of the tabs anew. On the side
piece I reduced them from four to three and shaped them more
triangular to give the stays at least some 80's flare. The wider
tabs also allow using wide boning, as trying to jam 8mm wide
boning into period correct boning layouts with narrow tabs is
often impossible. The back tabs also got a slightly more refined
shape.
I made a mock up
version number two with the alterations listed above. It still
needed a few little changes. Apparently I had partly misplaced
the curve on the side-front seam, which resulted in too much
room at the underarm. I took 1,5cm off at the top and curved
the seam a bit more in at the waist instead. I had been afraid
that the underarm might chafe and thus left it rather low
before, but now it seemed like it could well be higher. I
raised in a bit, reasoning that it could easily be lowered
still at an later stage if only I left the boning end a few
centimetres lower. The pattern in the picture above is of the
final pattern. With it I finally cut the coutil.

Sewing the stays
The construction is very close to the one in my pink
stays, with a few added time saving machine sewing tricks.
First I marked the pattern edges and boning channels on a double
layer of coutil, stitched them and them began inserting the
boning. Several changes in the pattern caused most of the boning
originally cut for the first mock up not to fit at all, and I
had once again quite a work in replacing and trimming what I
could of them and discarding the rest. After finally having
complete boning I rounded and filed the ends, inserted them and
closed the channel ends.
As Kaisa likes
strong colours I used red poly-cotton satin for the top
material combined with black edging. I placed the boned coutil
pieces on it and stitched the layers together at edges.

After closing the seams I have
usually sewed down the seam allowances by hand, but as I had
left a few millimeters gap between the seams and boning channels
to make sewing the seams easier I now decided to try stitching
the seam allowances open very narrowly just next to the seam.
The method was quite handy and fast, and the stitching would in
turn be covered by period-correct disguise of tape. I also
stitched the tape on by machine, as it was black on black so the
machine stitch is almost invisible.
To my great
annoyance I noticed, though, that the bone ends and especially
the crossing boning at the side-front top shows through the
shiny material, which highlights every little wrinkle too. My
pink stays had similar problems but thanks to the more
forgiving top material they did not jump out this much. On the
afterthought it would have been wider to add another layer for
the horizontal boning underneath, and of course the cable tie
is a bit heavy boning material for period look anyway.
My method of placing the boned coutil pieces on the top material
and stitching at the edges easily leaves the top material a bit
loose. Sideways this is actually intentional to prevent strain
on the top material, but as the stays curve on a body it easily
creates horizontal wrinkling at the waist. I think this effect
is impossible to wholly avoid unless you stitch the boning
channels through the top layer too, but it could perhaps be
diminished. So, I took off the stitching that held the layers
together at the lower edge and sewed them again while pulling
the satin downwards. Later I used the same trick on the
stomacher which curves a lot when worn.
When I was a bit happier with the way the
satin lied on the top I pinned the cotton batiste lining
on the underside.
I stitched the lining on at the edges and hand sewed it on
the lacing edges. Then I trimmed the edges and neatened
the edges with zig zag, which I had found very handy in
Ida's stays. I also reinforced the slit ends between the
tabs with dense zig zag.
I cut the bias
tape for the edging of black cotton satin with a dim shine.
Despite all the quick and dirty machine tricks I had used
until now the lower edge of stays is something that has to be
hand bound. With less tabs it was not really such a massive
chore, though.
To save time
and my hands I even resorted to metal eyelets, totally wrong
for the period but easy (especially as I had them put on in a
shop and didn't even attempt to do it myself with inadequate
tools). Now the stays could be tried on for the first time.
Happily the
shape looked right and Kaisa also assured me that the stays
were extremely comfortable on. As you can see in the picture,
the back waist still gaps a bit, so I could have well curved
the seams even more, but happily it doesn't affect the
comfort. I only wish I would have figured out this with my own
stays, as they tend to press my back at the waist when laced
very tight.
For the last
thing I sewed the binding tape on the top edge and stomacher
by machine on the right side. The underside is mostly sewn by
hand.

Conclusion
After the two mock ups to get the pattern
right and all the hassle with bones the stays themselves
came together quite effortlessly. Thanks to the metal
eyelets the amount of hand sewing was greatly reduced from
the usual. I'm quite pleased how they turned out, the shape
is pretty much what I aimed at and obviously they are
comfortable to wear.
As I mentioned before, I made one clear mistake with the
horizontal boning channels (and was too lazy to fix it), but
other issues with the neatness are mostly due to my
conscious decision to take all the possible shortcuts and
concentrate more effort on the dress to come on top. Of
course I should also have paid more attention in smoothing
the satin over the pieces in the first place.
This is, by the way, one of the very few photoshoots where I
have had the opportunity to be behind the camera myself,
though of course with a lot of technical assistance from my
husband. It was certainly much more fun that being in front
of the camera! I had the idea for a gothic horror theme
which was shot in the small hallway of our home, and I think
it turned out very nice. Of course it helps that the model
was extremely photogenic!